A federal appellate court is keeping Florida's social media law – intended to address alleged platform bias against conservatives – on hold, after a three-judge panel ruled that it was "substantially likely" that it violates the First Amendment.
The law, signed and championed by the state's governor Ron DeSantis takes aim at the content moderation practices of Facebook , Twitter and other sites, as it would prohibit the companies from de-platforming political candidates and prioritizing or de-prioritizing posts about a candidate. It also would prohibit platforms from removing anything posted by a "journalistic enterprise" based on its content, the judges noted.
"We further conclude that it is substantially likely that one of the law's particularly onerous disclosure provisions—which would require covered platforms to provide a 'thorough rationale' for each and every content-moderation decision they make—violates the First Amendment," Judge Kevin Newsom wrote in the opinion. (Read it here ).
The decision affirms a lower court ruling and an argument made by the social media companies that the First Amendment protects their decisions on what to allow on their sites.
In their decision, Newsom seemed to be trying to remind the public that social media platforms are "private enterprises, not governmental (or even quasi-governmental) entities."
"No one has an obligation to contribute to or consume the content that the platforms make available," they wrote. "And correlatively, while the Constitution protects citizens from governmental efforts to restrict their access to social media no one has a vested right to force a platform to allow her to contribute to or consume social-media content."
Newsom was nominated to the federal appellate court by President Donald Trump, who has been a frequent critic of the social media platforms. Trump launched Truth Social, a rival to Twitter, in part because of his claims that the platform was biased against voices on the right.
Newsom also wrote that the platforms aren't just "dumb pipes."
"They're not just servers and hard drives storing information or hosting blogs that anyone can access, and they're not internet service providers reflexively transmitting data from point A to point B," he wrote.
Meanwhile, internet platforms have appealed to the Supreme Court in their effort to put a Texas law on hold. A federal appeals court in Texas lifted an injunction on that law earlier this month. The Texas law prohibits large platforms from censoring users based on viewpoint.
- Florida governor appeals court rulings on voting
- Appeals court ruling opens door to Ohio resuming executions
- The Trump Administration Can Continue To Force Asylum-Seekers To Wait In Mexico, A Federal Appeals Court Ruled
- Federal Appeals Court Rules Ban on Pre-Game Prayer Violates Free Speech
- Violent protests force Uganda government to review social media tax
- Federal prosecutors ask appeals court to uphold Tsarnaev conviction and death sentence
- Health groups call out tobacco marketing aimed at teens on social media
- Uganda shuts down social media; candidates arrested on election day
- Trump Voices Support for Social Media Legislation Conservatives Call a Free-Speech Killer
- Uganda government sued over social media tax
- Where is Essena O'Neill now? Social media star, 23, RETURNS to Instagram four years after she mysteriously vanished from the internet... and her life could not be more different
- Suspicionless phone searches at the border are unconstitutional, court rules
- Mexico top court rules e-cigarette sales should be allowed
- Appeals Court Refuses to Block Trump Rule That Would Cut Planned Parenthood Funding
- Germany warns citizens to be careful on social media when in Turkey
- 'Emu plucker' avoids jail time after guilty plea to animal cruelty in viral social media video
- "It's kinda crazy": Kid influencers make big money on social media, and few rules apply
- On proposed social media regulations
- 10 Philadelphia Police Officers Placed On Desk Duty Due To Investigation Over Alleged Racist, Violent Social Media Posts
- The hottest new thing on social media could destroy someone else
Florida’s Social Media Law Likely Violates First Amendment, Appeals Court Rules have 650 words, post on deadline.com at May 23, 2022. This is cached page on Movie News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.